State of Washington

Ethics Advisory Committee

Opinion 01-03

Question

May court clerical staff, with the knowledge of a judicial officer(s), change, alter, amend a charging document filed with the court that reflects a mismatch between the cited RCW section and the language of the cited RCW section appearing on the charging document so that the cited RCW and the language on the charging document match?

Answer

CJC Canon 2(A) provides in part that judges should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. Canon 3(B)(2) provides in part that judges should require their staff to observe the standards of fidelity and diligence that apply to them. CJC Canon 2(A) and 3(B)(2) prohibit a judicial officer from allowing court staff to change, alter or amend a charging document because that is an executive function and that practice would undermine the public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

The Supreme Court adopted a new Code of Judicial Conduct effective January 1, 2011. In addition to reviewing the ethics advisory opinions, the following should be noted:

CJC 1.2
CJC 2.12(A)

Opinion 01-03

04/03/2001

 

Privacy and Disclaimer NoticesSitemap

© Copyright 2024. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.

S3